Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rafa Joseph's avatar

Thank you, Dorie, for bringing my poetry to a broader audience — and for decorating it with such splendid photos, and a most worthy cause! The rabbits are beautiful, and your readers most graceful. No better time could be had by any poet.

Seeing how criticism is the highest form of flattery, please allow me to pose a question:

Would it truly be helpful to see the world of things built by men 'burn to embittered ash'? This world contains many useful things: vaccines to stymie disease; running faucets and operational toilets, to manage inflow and outflow; air conditioning (although I'll be first to admit my sex has an annoying habit of setting it uncomfortably low). I humbly hope that this desire to immolate, contains at least *a bit of* hyperbole. Just enough to permit me to keep my writing desk, my piano and a CamelBak for hiking.

In my view, it is a tremendous benefit for persons of each social group and persuasion to have free access to things built by every other. I would hate to be forbidden all cultural appropriation, and condemned to do math problems without Arabic numerals. Maryam Mirzakhani, the first woman to win the prestigious Fields Medal for mathematics, would likely concur.

The achievements of every human demographic fit snugly within the realm of human achievement, and ought to belong to all (wo)mankind. Even inventions created prior to the advent of women's rights were not uniformly built 'upon the kneeled backs' of women, as many females actively participated in their creation, and in the sustenance of the lives of their creators. In many cases, females *were* the creators.

Considering the massive disparities in (formal and informal) rights and liberties enjoyed by women between different cultures and time periods, I do not see how it can be productive to collectivize the female sex into a singular interest group, and advocate for the empowerment of this group by calling for it to metaphorically 'tread upon' a future floor wrought of masculinity. A variety of different women would benefit from this scenario, for sure, but several would also suffer. Those whose status and resources result from their alignment with powerful men, or their positions within male institutions, come to mind.

This isn't a point I can comprehensively argue within the space of a short comment, but I do believe that men and women need each other. Not as discrete gendered factions of humanity with unique roles complementing one another (as in the patriarchal worldview), but as (biologically) distinct arrays of unique individuals with overlapping interests and skill-sets, fated to integrate via consensual cooperation (as in the liberal worldview).

With all due respect to my most graceful and formidable hostess, there is a point beyond which gender activism becomes illiberal. This is the point *beyond which* I would prefer that it not be taken.

I'm working hard on a stage musical set in 19th-century Russia, chronicling the plight of one ambitious woman during the "turn" of 1st-wave feminism. Writing in this time period is incredibly satisfying, as none of the voices for social justice from it were anywhere close to going too far (perhaps save those few aching to expropriate and trample 'the bourgeoisie'). This setting permits me to lend my pen to the cause of social justice and rage away at full fury, without accidentally razing any whole civilizations.

Miles Hack's avatar

The power of the feminine is alive and well, I feel it in this piece!! So proud of you both and your will to describe in aesthetic lore, the power of the heart and the soft hands really sat with me… and how the words contrast the immense fortitude — paralleled, yet highly variable in many ways — in relation to the power struggles happening on earth, with the nourishing energy enduring through the plight. The piece really does embody the strength to persevere and not be extinguished. WowZ & BowZ in respect to this!

42 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?